The Delano Grape Strike: The Manong Generation's Fight For Rights
  • Title
  • Home
  • The Plight
    • Racial Discrimination
    • Anti-Miscegenation Laws
    • Poor Living and Working Conditions
  • Rights
    • The Filipino Strike Leaders and Farmworkers
    • The Growers' Viewpoint
    • Rights Gained
  • Responsibilities
    • Actively Support the Union
    • Unity Among Workers
    • Working With Supporters
    • Workers' Welfare
  • Conclusion
    • Preserving the Legacy
  • Research
    • Interview Transcript

     The Filipino farmworkers showed responsibility in fighting for their rights by being highly organized, promoting worker’s welfare, and practicing nonviolence. Through these efforts, the farmworkers gained massive popular support and achieved the goals of the strike.

        If the strike had been violent, the striking farmworkers may not have secured the public’s support and the growers may not have been pressured to enter into a collective bargaining agreement with the Union in 1970.

       But as it happened, with rights and responsibilities going together, with the solidarity of the Latino workers under the leadership of Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta, help of people like Senator Robert F. Kennedy, Walter Reuther, the support of church, labor, student, professional groups and the public, in general, the strike started by a group of elderly Filipino farmworkers (the “Manongs”), became a significant milestone in American labor history and henceforth became known as the “Great Delano Grape Strike of 1965.”



Picture
"1968 UFW Meeting: Larry Itliong/LeRoy Chatfield" (Photo and Caption from Farmworker Movement Online Gallery)


"The cornerstone of the farmworker movement was nonviolence. This policy was publicly proclaimed at every opportunity because: 1) it 
hindered the growers from using brute force to crush the strike; 2) it encouraged farmworkers to strike without fearing for their lives; 3) it encouraged volunteers, especially students, to come to Delano with a sense of personal safety; 4) it prompted a positive response from church bodies and religious organizations; 5) it checked the natural propensity of farmworker strikers and organizers to retaliate in kind; 6) it forced the union leadership to be more creative and imaginative in bringing enough pressure on the growers to recognize the union. Ultimately, nonviolence forced the development of an international table grape boycott, which caused the growers to fight on turf they could not control. It was the boycott that forced union recognition, brought about signed contracts."


-LeRoy Chatfield
From interview by Professor Paul Henggeler


“The vast majority of the arrest cases were dismissed. Most of them were for violating an injunction or for unlawful assembly x x x when you think that 3,589 people were arrested, I think well over 3,400 of those were clear First Amendment issues and had nothing to do with even alleged disturbing the peace or anything like that. So it was an amazing performance by the farm workers. They really kept their cool when they were attacked.”

-Jerry Cohen
 General Counsel for the UFW

Picture
"Dolores Huerta addresses a rally with Jerry Cohen and Larry Itliong" (Photo and Caption from Farmworker Movement Online Gallery)

Picture
"In 1966 there were two farmworker unions - Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee (AWOC) & National Farm Workers Association (NFWA) - The March was sponsored by the NFWA but many AWOC members signed on as marchers."(Photo and Caption from the Farmworker Movement Online Gallery)
Picture
"Twenty-Five Day Fast 1968 - Catholic nuns assist at Catholic Mass to mark end of Fast for Nonviolence (Photo and Caption from the Farmworker Movement Online Gallery)
Picture
"Lupe Murgia carries the cross, followed by Father Mark Day, Cesar Chaves, Philip Veracruz and Julio Hernandez during the 1968 fast for nonviolence." (Photo and Caption from Farmworker Movement Online Gallery)

“I was so disturbed by the violence of the ‘60’s. I felt that this (boycott) was one of those rare nonviolent pushes for change that we should support if we were ever going to see change … Also I wasn’t alone in my sympathy and protest … There was an organized way for me to become involved.”

- Lynn Ransford
Teacher & Mother of 2
Los Angeles, CA


Picture
"Lynn Adams and Julian Balidoy, organizers for the pledge drive in Los Angeles during the Grape Boycott, 1969."(Photo and Caption from Image galleries -The Labor Movement and Organizations - United Farm Workers - Walter Reuther Library)
Picture
"Delano farmworkers, joined by other Labor Union workers, came to San Francisco to march and carry 'Boycott DiGiorgio' picket signs" (Photo and Caption from the Farmworker Movement Online Gallery)
Picture
"Supporters of the Grape Boycott demonstrate in Toronto, Ontario, December, 1968." (Photo and Caption from Image galleries -The Labor Movement and Organizations - United Farm Workers - Walter Reuther Library)
"Since this right to bargain with strength as free men has been consistently denied to farmworkers in this rich agricultural valley, their only recourse in an effort to gain it for themselves has been to strike. We are satisfied that no other avenues of procedure have remained open to them, and that the only way in which they can secure justice for themselves is to continue striking until such time as the owners are willing to enter into negotiation. Consequently, we feel compelled to identify ourselves unambiguously with their protest against such unjust treatment, and commend the pledge of non-violence which they have faithfully fulfilled."


-Religious Leader's Statement
December 14, 1965



Previous: Workers' Welfare
Next: Preserving the Legacy
Michael Navarro Jr.
Junior Division
Individual Website
National History Day 2014
Word Count: 1153
Proudly powered by Weebly